<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ondiversity.com &#187; 2009 &#187; November &#187; 30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ondiversity.com/2009/11/30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ondiversity.com</link>
	<description>An international CONFERENCE, a scholarly JOURNAL, a BOOK series, and an online KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WOMEN IN SCIENCE: Preferences and Penalties Differ</title>
		<link>http://ondiversity.com/2009/11/30/women-in-science-preferences-and-penalties-differ/</link>
		<comments>http://ondiversity.com/2009/11/30/women-in-science-preferences-and-penalties-differ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ondiversity.mu.commongroundpublishing.com/?p=2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raegen T. Miller reviews the book The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and Girls by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams in Science for 20 November 2009: Two groups of people should care about the underrepresentation of women in math-intensive fields: academics and everyone else. In The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1910" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 230px"><a href="http://ondiversity.com/files/2009/12/maths-marks.gif" target=_blank><img class="size-full wp-image-1910 " title="maths-marks" src="/files/2009/12/maths-marks.gif" alt="CREDIT: JUPITERIMAGES" width="220" height="176" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">CREDIT: JUPITERIMAGES</p></div>
<p>Raegen T. Miller reviews the book <em>The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and Girls</em> by Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams in <em>Science</em> for 20 November 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p>Two groups of people should care about the underrepresentation<sup> </sup>of women in math-intensive fields: academics and everyone else.<sup> </sup>In <em>The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire<sup> </sup>to Limit Talented Women and Girls</em>, Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy<sup> </sup>M. Williams provide a valuable resource for both audiences.<sup> </sup>For academics, their book may help diffuse political tension<sup> </sup>inimical to the goals of the academy. Currently, the issue of<sup> </sup>underrepresentation is a political lightning rod, and scholars<sup> </sup>are virtually guaranteed to attract abundant criticism for posing<sup> </sup>and testing any hypothesis explaining gender disparities among<sup> </sup>scientists in different fields. Such criticism is not always<sup> </sup>confined to the scientific merits of its recipient&#8217;s work, and<sup> </sup>junior scholars, in particular, may jeopardize their careers<sup> </sup>by pursuing research agendas speaking to the relative scarcity<sup> </sup>of women in mathematically oriented fields. An intellectualclimate more conducive to self-censorship than the pursuit of<sup> </sup>knowledge seems unlikely to help explain the issue of underrepresentation,<sup> </sup>much less address it. In other words, the academy has painted<sup> </sup>itself into a corner, and it needs help getting out. In this<sup> </sup>sense, <em>The Mathematics of Sex</em> is a lifeline.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/326/5956/1063-b" target="_blank">For more (subscription required)&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ondiversity.com/2009/11/30/women-in-science-preferences-and-penalties-differ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

